Connect with us

Leadership Conversations

In A Classic Case of Global Gamesmanship Jeffrey Hall Reverse Engineered A Takeover Of PanJam To Create Pan Jamaica Group and Secure a 30% Stake In Sagicor Group Jamaica In One Move.

Published

on

The following is a strategic and creative editorial opinion piece relying on published reports on the transaction.

Jamaican conglomerates Jamaica Producers Group Limited (JP) led by Jeffrey Hall and PanJam Investment Limited (PanJam) led by Stephen Facey announced recently that they will merge their operations creating the Pan Jamaica Group Limited. The transaction is expected to be completed within the first quarter of 2023 with both the renamed Pan Jamaica Group and JP remain listed on the main market of the Jamaica Stock Exchange.

Question? Did Stephen Facey’s PanJam acquire Jamaica Producers Group’s sprawling global food, beverage, shipping and logistics operations or did Jeffrey Hall engineer a strategic takeover of PanJam’s global services network of interests in hotels and attractions, business process outsourcing?

Global Gamesmanship

Other media outlets and the entities themselves have described the pending transaction as a “Business Combination”.

That’s what it looks like on the surface, but a closer look will reveal what we at Businessuite are calling a strategically engineered global gamesmanship move, involving the takeover of PanJam, and securing control of a 30% stake in Sagicor Group Jamaica by Jeffrey Hall at Jamaica Producers in one move.

To better understand this position, we need to look closer at the deal structure and a term called Global Gamesmanship or what HBR calls “competing under strategic interdependence,” or CSI.
(https://hbr.org/2003/05/global-gamesmanship)

In an article titled Global Gamesmanship published by Ian MacMillan, Alexander B. van Putten, and Rita McGrath in HBR, they note that “competition among multinationals these days is likely to be a three-dimensional game of global chess: The moves an organization makes in one market are designed to achieve goals in another market in ways that aren’t immediately apparent to its rivals. We call this approach “competing under strategic interdependence,” or CSI. And where this strategic interdependence exists, the complexity of the competitive situation can quickly overwhelm ordinary analysis.”

So how did Jeffrey Hall pull of this chess move?

The Opening – Preparation To Financing The Move.

The amalgamation agreement contemplates two sets of transactions that ultimately give effect to the combination of the major operating businesses of JP with the businesses of PanJam under a single legal entity.

The first set of transactions involves transferring the JP Business to a recently formed entity called JP Global, pursuant to a Scheme of Reconstruction.

International assets and listed securities will be transferred from JP to JP Global in exchange for shares in JP Global such that, upon completion of these transfers, JP Global will have 561,565,133 issued and outstanding ordinary shares.

The Middle Game – Acquisition and Check Mate

The second set of transactions or series of moves involves the transfer of the JP Global Shares by JP to PanJam.

This move involves JP transferring the JP Global Shares to PanJam in exchange for the issue and allotment to JP of the PanJam Exchange Shares. In other words, Hall leverages the value in JP Global to acquire the Shares in PanJam.

This transfer is conducted in accordance with the Amalgamation Agreement where the end result is the combination of the material businesses of PanJam and JP effected by way of an exchange of shares.

To execute the move Hall then allows PanJam to acquire all of the issued share capital of JP Global, and in exchange PanJam issues and allot the PanJam Exchange Shares to JP as consideration for the acquisition of the JP Global Shares.

To facilitate this there was an increase in the share capital of PanJam by the creation of an unlimited number of new ordinary shares, from which the PanJam Exchange Shares will be allotted as a part of the Amalgamation.

Hall’s Check Mate

With this move Hall and JP will become the largest shareholder in PanJam holding 34.5% of the issued ordinary shares. It should be noted that Hall still has control of the stake in JP Global as PanJam would become the sole shareholder of the company. So, what did he really give up?

On completion Jeffrey Hall now in effective control of Pan Jamaica Group will now have JA$112 billion in combined assets and other resources at his disposal.

Although Pan Jamaica Group will initially be chaired by Stephen Facey, Hall as executive vice-chairman and CEO wields far more power, influence and control on the board and his shareholding. He is further supported and strengthen with JP Chairman Charles Johnston and Chief Financial Officer Alan Buckland who are expected to join him on the Pan Jamaica Group board.

But there’s more!

The Endgame – Sagicor Group Jamaica

A major benefit of the merger and transaction is that from Sector Diversification. The combined portfolio of enterprises and interests that will form part of the Pan Jamaica Group (PJG) will straddle four main overlapping business activities of which Financial Services is one.

The portfolio of financial services interests will include associated companies in life insurance, health insurance, pension management, investment management, general insurance, foreign exchange trading, money services, investment banking, commercial banking and micro-finance.

This network of enterprises, has Sagicor Group Jamaica Limited at its core, with a very significant and valuable reach across Jamaican financial markets.

This we believe is the real prize for Jeffrey Hall and Pan Jamaica Group. Hall through Pan Jamaica Group will now own and control a significant 30.2 per cent stake in Sagicor Group Jamaica further boosting his power and influence.

Sagicor Group Jamaica listed on the Main Market of the JSE, will be the largest investment by assets for PJG, with operations in Jamaica, Cayman Islands and Costa Rica. Sagicor is the leading life and health insurer and pension fund manager in Jamaica. It also has operations in investment banking and operates the largest local unit trust.

It owns the fourth largest Jamaican commercial bank by assets, and recently ventured into general insurance and remittances with the acquisitions of Advantage General Insurance Company Limited and Alliance Financial Services Limited, respectively.

Pan Jamaica Group will derive much of its income from its 30% stake in Sagicor Group Jamaica. To secure this revenue stream going into the future Hall will want to have a closer relationship with this company, and will no doubt demand his fair share of the seats on the Sagicor Group Jamaica board of directors.

Hall’s Next Move?

The big question now is what is Hall’s next move and how far will he go. If he can engineer a takeover of PanJam, rolling up his JP into Pan Jamaica Group, why not execute the same strategy, rollup Pan Jamaica Group into Sagicor Group Jamaica?

To do this however he will have to go through Sagicor Financial Company Ltd.

Sagicor Financial Company is a financial services conglomerate operating in the USA, Latin America and the Caribbean region, and importantly is the sole owner of Sagicor Life Inc, which holds 49.11% of Sagicor Group Jamaica.

Given that he already has control over a significant 30.2 per cent stake in Sagicor Group Jamaica Limited, Hall could pick up some more from other smaller holders.

Sagicor Pooled Equity Fund is a connected company, which control another 2.34% of Sagicor Jamaica. Together with Sagicor Life Inc these two parties haves over 51% of Sagicor Jamaica, which would make any move by Hall to take over Sagicor Jamaica highly difficult, but not impossible.

We suspect however, that Hall and Joanna A. Banks, who is set to become the youngest and most powerful woman in corporate Jamaica, will have their hands full for the next couple of years with Pan Jamaica Group. But who knows, who saw the Jamaica Producers Group Limited and PanJam Investment Limited deal coming.

One thing is however clear Jeffrey Hall, CEO and Executive Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors Pan Jamaica Group is arguably one of the most powerful men in corporate Jamaica and the Caribbean.

So Did Stephen Facey’s PanJam acquire Jamaica Producers Group’s sprawling global food, beverage, shipping and logistics operations or did Jeffrey Hall engineer a strategic takeover of PanJam’s global services network of interests in hotels and attractions, business process outsourcing?

To be updated.

 

How Jamaica Producers Group Has Been Organised To Generate Revenues From A Diverse Range Of Business Lines

 

Jeffrey Hall Is Set To Be One Of The Most Powerful Men In Corporate Jamaica And The Caribbean. So, Who Is He?

 

 

Where Will Pan Jamaica Group Rank On The Businessuite Caribbean Top 100?

PanJam Investment And Jamaica Producers Group Join Forces To Form Pan Jamaica Group

Continue Reading
2 Comments
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
trackback
2 years ago

[…] In A Classic Case of Global Gamesmanship Jeffrey Hall Reverse Engineered A Takeover Of PanJam To Cre… […]

trackback
2 years ago

[…] In A Classic Case of Global Gamesmanship Jeffrey Hall Reverse Engineered A Takeover Of PanJam To Cre… […]

Business Insights

Businessuite Cover Story: Too Much Power? Governance Risks Rise as Tyrone Wilson Consolidates Leadership at Kintyre and Visual Vibe

Introducing a non-executive Chair, appointing dedicated executives for strategic verticals, and strengthening board committees are proven routes to balancing entrepreneurial dynamism with fiduciary responsibility.

Published

on

• Mr. Tyrone Wilson, who currently serves as Chairman, President & CEO of Kintyre Holdings (JA) Limited, and Chairman of Visual Vibe, has formally assumed the additional role of Chief Executive Officer of Visual Vibe, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. 
• Ms. Jasmin Aslan has been appointed as Chief Business Officer (CBO) of Kintyre Holdings (JA) Limited, effective July 1, 2025.
• Mr. Andrew Wildish has resigned from his role as Chief Investment Officer of Kintyre Holdings (JA) Limited, effective June 30, 2025. The Company’s investment strategy will now be assumed by Chairman, President & CEO Tyrone Wilson, and will be supported by the Investment Committee of the Board, chaired by Mr. Nick Rowles-Davies.

When Mr. Tyrone Wilson, Chairman, President, and CEO of Kintyre Holdings (JA) Limited, stepped into the additional role of Chief Executive Officer at Visual Vibe—alongside his existing portfolio—industry observers took note. His move, following the resignation of Chief Investment Officer Andrew Wildish, now consolidates strategic, operational, and governance control under one leader across the two connected companies.

While some argue that this concentration of power streamlines decision-making, particularly in smaller or fast-moving firms, global governance standards paint a starkly different picture.

From the UK’s Cadbury Code to the OECD and US Dodd-Frank regulations, best practice guidelines consistently recommend separating the roles of Board Chair and CEO. The rationale is simple: independent oversight safeguards shareholders by ensuring that strategic decisions, executive compensation, and performance evaluations are objectively scrutinized. Harvard Law’s corporate governance research found that dual-role companies often pay more to their top executives and face elevated ESG and accounting risks, with lower long-term returns to shareholders.

In Mr. Wilson’s case, the risks are amplified by his assumption of the departed CIO’s investment strategy responsibilities. While an Investment Committee chaired by Mr. Nick Rowles-Davies will provide support, the absence of a dedicated CIO raises questions about execution bandwidth, focus, and strategic continuity.

His move, following the resignation of Chief Investment Officer Andrew Wildish, now consolidates strategic, operational, and governance control under one leader across the two connected companies.

Recent global examples demonstrate the potential fallout:

At Boeing, CEO Dennis Muilenburg’s dual role contributed to oversight failures during the 737 MAX crisis.

Starbucks faced shareholder pressure to separate Chair and CEO roles held by Kevin Johnson and later Laxman Narasimhan.

At Volkswagen, Oliver Blume’s simultaneous leadership of VW Group and Porsche raised warnings of strategic drift and governance conflict.

For shareholders, these scenarios underline a core truth: Checks and balances matter. Without an independent Chair to challenge decisions, or a standalone CEO focused solely on operational delivery, companies risk poor accountability, strategic blind spots, and diminished investor confidence.

Furthermore, frequent senior departures, as seen with Wildish’s exit, create instability, potentially eroding morale, institutional knowledge, and external credibility. For companies like Kintyre and Visual Vibe, operating in competitive markets requiring agile yet well-governed leadership, the tension between efficiency and accountability has never been more stark.

The path forward? Independent governance experts recommend immediate board-level evaluation of leadership structures to ensure robust oversight. Introducing a non-executive Chair, appointing dedicated executives for strategic verticals, and strengthening board committees are proven routes to balancing entrepreneurial dynamism with fiduciary responsibility.

At the heart of it all lies a question shareholders must ask: When one person wears too many hats, who holds them accountable?

Foot Notes

Governance Best Practices: CEO & Chair Separation

Independence & Oversight
– Combining CEO and Chair roles concentrates power in one person, weakening board oversight and independent challenge
– Governance codes worldwide (UK Cadbury, OECD, Dodd-Frank, etc.) recommend separate roles to avoid conflicts of interest and boost board independence

Costs & Performance
– Studies show companies with dual roles tend to pay more to the leader, exhibit higher ESG and accounting risks, and often deliver lower long‑term returns

Efficiency vs. Accountability
– Proponents argue unified leadership can streamline decision-making, especially in small, fast-moving or crisis settings
– Critics note that efficiency gains are outweighed by weakened accountability, less board challenge, and riskier executive decisions

Risks of Tyrone Wilson Holding Multiple Executive Roles

1. Conflict of Interest & Oversight Blind Spots
As CEO, President, and Board Chair of Kintyre, plus CEO of Visual Vibe, Mr. Wilson controls operational, strategic, and governance levers. This vertical integration drastically reduces independent oversight.

As BoardEvals points out, the Chair should be able to “challenge the CEO’s performance”—impossible when they’re the same person

2. Governance and Shareholder Accountability
– The Board’s duties include setting senior pay and evaluating leadership. With a unified Chair/CEO, Mr. Wilson effectively oversees his own compensation and reviews—undermining fiduciary trust
– Transparency risks arise if disclosures and rationale for dual roles aren’t clearly communicated to shareholders, as required under Dodd‑Frank §972 .

3. Execution Risk & Burnout
Fulfilling multiple demanding roles reduces bandwidth and focus. There’s evidence dual roles can dilute effectiveness and increase error risk .

4. Investor Confidence & Market Perception
– Majority of global investors favor role separation. Even large US firms are moving in that direction (44% of S&P 500 now combined vs. 57% a decade ago)

– Cases like VW (Blume), Starbucks (Niccol), Boeing (Muilenburg) show shareholders raising flags when executives take on both roles

Executive Departures & Instability
Andrew Wildish’s departure as CIO on June 30, replaced by Mr. Wilson & an Investment Committee, indicates a consolidation of high-level roles. Multiple senior exits can signal:

Leadership instability, undermining investor confidence and organizational clarity.

Strategic drift, especially in areas requiring specialized expertise.

Increased “agency” and “entrenchment” risk – where board oversight may be compromised by concentrated executive power .

Shareholder Considerations
Investors should be concerned when:

Checks and balances are diminished
With one executive occupying so many strategic and governance roles, board objectivity may be compromised.

Succession and crisis management are jeopardized
Who leads if Mr. Wilson is unavailable? What happens if rapid decisions are needed? Lack of emergency backup risks business continuity.

Specialized oversight is reduced
Investment strategy, compliance, audit—all risk oversight gaps when not handled by dedicated, independent executives.

External advisors step in
If retained, external governors may mitigate some risks—but at added cost and complexity.

Continue Reading

Entrepreneurship

Building a Business While Working a 9–5: The Real Hustle Behind the Dream

Published

on

Starting a new business is bold. Starting one while managing a full-time 9–5? That’s a different kind of brave.

For many aspiring entrepreneurs, the safety net of a full-time job provides stability while pursuing a passion project or startup dream. But make no mistake — it takes strategy, discipline, and an honest understanding of your limits.

Here’s what I’ve learned (and am still learning) as I straddle both worlds:

1. Time Becomes Your Most Valuable Currency
With only early mornings, lunch breaks, and late nights to spare, you begin to spend time like money. You’ll learn quickly that not every meeting is worth it, not every opportunity is aligned, and not every “yes” deserves your energy.

2. Boundaries Are Everything
Your job deserves your full attention during business hours. Your startup deserves its own sacred space. Without clear boundaries, burnout is inevitable and performance can suffer — in both areas.

3. You Don’t Have to Do It Alone
Whether it’s a co-founder, a freelance designer, or a virtual assistant, small investments in support can pay off big in time and sanity. And yes, your network is a secret weapon.

4. Progress Over Perfection
You won’t launch with the perfect website, the flawless pitch deck, or a viral brand — and that’s okay. The most important step is the next one. Small, consistent progress compounds.

5. Clarity Comes Through Action
You might start your business thinking it will go one way, only to find your true niche or product-market fit halfway down the road. That clarity won’t come from overthinking — it comes from doing.

Starting a business while working a full-time job isn’t about being superhuman — it’s about being deeply committed to a bigger vision while managing your current responsibilities with integrity.

To those in the thick of the hustle — keep going. You’re not alone, and you’re not crazy. You’re building something meaningful.
If you’re in this season too, I’d love to hear your story. What’s your business? What’s working? What’s not?

Let’s connect and support each other.

Rojah Thomas Co-Founder at Kree8 Hive!
Sales & marketing maven, passionate marketer with a love for sales. With over 8 years experience in the field, I offer a refreshing new age approach to marketing with a direct focus on sales and ROI.

Continue Reading

Business Insights

You Can’t Fix What You Can’t See: Why Jamaica Broilers’ U.S. Collapse Wasn’t Just Financial, It Was Strategic

Published

on

A supply chain leader’s take on how weak governance, poor integration, and reactive leadership cost Jamaica Broilers billions, and what Caribbean firms must do differently.

As a Jamaican-born supply chain executive working in the United States, I’ve seen firsthand how ambition without execution can quickly become a liability. That’s exactly what happened to Jamaica Broilers Group Limited. For nearly 70 years, JBG has been a symbol of Caribbean manufacturing excellence. However, in early 2025, the company announced its first quarterly loss in history, primarily driven by a $1.15 billion loss from its U.S. operations.

Recent news articles suggest that miscalculations in valuing inventory and biological assets contributed to financial losses. As a leader in operations, financial transformation, and supply chain audits, I can state:

This was not just a financial mistake. It was a strategic failure of systems, governance, and business leadership.

The Numbers Tell the Story

Based on regulatory filings and media reports from Our Today and the Jamaica Observer, here’s what went wrong:

  • JBG admitted to using “unsubstantiated accounting valuation methodologies” affecting inventories and biological assets
  • The company expects a material restatement of U.S. earnings
  • It recorded a J$1.15 billion quarterly loss, compared to a J$1.3 billion profit the year before
  • U.S. operating profit fell from J$2.98 billion to J$922 million over nine months
  • The entire U.S. leadership team was removed, including Stephen Levy, the CEO’s brother
  • External financial advisors were brought in, and reports were delayed twice before being released

This wasn’t an isolated oversight. It was a total breakdown in the systems that connect supply chain performance to financial truth.

Where the Strategy Failed

1. Operations and Finance Were Completely Disconnected

JBG’s misstatement of inventory and biological assets tells me one thing: Finance was not operating with real-time data from the supply chain. In an asset-heavy industry like poultry, valuation accuracy is directly tied to production yields, biological input tracking, and inventory turnover. If those systems are disconnected, your balance sheet is based on assumptions.

Insight: You can’t fix what you can’t see. Real-time inventory visibility is no longer optional, especially in a low-margin industry.

2. Governance Was Passive, Not Proactive

The issues in the U.S. operation were only uncovered during a quarterly review. This means that for months, the leadership based in Jamaica had no visibility into what was truly occurring. There were no warning signs, no escalation triggers, and no governance frameworks in place to identify these missteps earlier.

Insight: Foreign subsidiaries must be governed as extensions of the enterprise, not as independent silos. Operational governance is not a meeting, it is a system.

3. No Strategic Positioning in the U.S. Market

JBG tried to enter the U.S. poultry market as a mainstream player. No diaspora segmentation. No culturally driven SKUs. No unique value proposition. That meant they were competing directly with industry giants like Tyson Foods and Sanderson Farms, with no brand edge or pricing power.

Insight: In the U.S., don’t compete on commodity. Compete on culture, value, and customer alignment. JBG ignored the Caribbean diaspora, and with it, a major advantage.

4. Overexpansion Without Standardization

JBG operated two facilities in the United States, located in Iowa and South Carolina, without a unified operational model. The systems were not standardized, and the processes were not synchronized. The resulting consequences were significant.

  • Ballooning operating expenses
  • Fragmented performance metrics
  • Reduced supply chain efficiency

Insight: Expansion is not growth unless it is built on a repeatable model. Two facilities without one process is not scale, it is confusion.

What They Still Haven’t Fixed

Despite public admissions and leadership changes, JBG has not yet addressed:

  • Whether it will consolidate operations under a single facility
  • How will it implement diaspora-driven branding and product segmentation
  • What new controls are being put in place for real-time operational audits
  • How will its ERP or financial reporting systems be upgraded

The response remains focused on personnel. But this was never just a people problem. It was a process problem.

My Recommendations for Caribbean Firms Entering the U.S.

As someone who has optimized supply chains, here is what I recommend:

1. Integrate ERP Systems Across All Operational Units

Ensure that inventory data, production yields, and cost accounting are aligned and communicate effectively with one another daily.

2. Establish Governance With Clear Escalation Protocols

Don’t wait for quarterly reports. Build monthly audits, early-warning triggers, and local compliance reviews into your operations.

3. Build With Culture at the Center

Diaspora markets are not just nostalgic, they are loyal. Own that connection with specialized SKUs and targeted marketing.

4. Standardize Before You Scale

Replicate only what works. Make sure your first location operates with precision before opening a second.

5. Tell the Truth Sooner

Market trust is built on clarity. Communicate failures transparently, and show the systems being built to prevent recurrence.

I’m not writing this to criticize JBG. I share this because I’ve witnessed this narrative repeatedly. This was a billion-dollar lesson, highlighting the need for Caribbean businesses to prioritize operational discipline over mere optimism when expanding into the U.S.

Financial breakdowns start as operational blind spots. Visibility isn’t a luxury—it’s the foundation of trust.

Jermaine Robinson, MBA, CSCP
Strategic Supply Chain Leader | Global Logistics & Distribution Leader | Driving Operational Excellence & Digital Transformation

The views and opinions expressed are those of the author/s and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of companies or clients for whom the author/s are currently working or have worked. Any content provided by the author/s is of their opinion and is not intended to malign any religion, ethnic group, club, organization, company, individual, or anyone or anything.

Continue Reading

Leadership Conversations

Why Some CEOs Resist the Concept of Buy-In

Published

on

In my years of working with CEOs during strategic planning, I’ve noticed a surprising resistance among some leaders to the concept of buy-in. To these CEOs, seeking input or engagement from employees feels like a sign of weakness. They believe leadership should be about mandating change and that buy-in dilutes their authority. This resistance, while common, often undermines the very success they aim to achieve through strategic planning.

The CEO’s Perspective on Buy-In
For many CEOs, strategic planning aims to create change—often significant, organization-wide change. They understand that change is difficult and frequently met with resistance, particularly from employees accustomed to the status quo. However, their response is often to mandate change, dismissing the need for employee involvement.

This approach stems from the belief that engaging employees in the planning process equates to surrendering control or being held hostage by their resistance. Confident in their vision, these CEOs view buy-in as an unnecessary hurdle, preferring to impose decisions with a “comply or leave” mentality.

The Case for Buy-In
My counterargument is simple yet profound: decisions are only effective if they are supported by those who must implement them. Dr. Robert Zawacki of the University of Colorado articulates this well in his book Transforming the Mature Information Technology Organisation. He argues:

Effective Decisions = The Right Decision X Commitment to the Decision (ED = RD x CD).

This formula highlights that even the best decisions will fail without the commitment of those responsible for implementing them. Commitment doesn’t arise from compulsion—it comes from understanding and shared ownership.

The Power of Participation
Engaging employees in the planning process fosters a deeper understanding and greater alignment. When employees are involved in crafting the parts of the plan that impact their work, they are more likely to accept and embrace the required changes. It aligns with the adage:

“If they create it, they understand it. If they understand it, they commit to it.”

Participation doesn’t mean ceding control; it means building a coalition of committed individuals who will champion the plan’s execution. Buy-in transforms resistance into ownership, turning a potential liability into an asset.

The Bottom Line
CEOs who dismiss buy-in as a weakness fail to see it as a tool of strategic strength. Leadership is not just about creating the right plan—it’s about ensuring that the plan succeeds. Engaging employees is not a concession; it’s a strategy for building commitment, aligning efforts, and achieving lasting change.

Buy-in isn’t just a nice-to-have; it’s the multiplier that turns the right decisions into practical actions.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ronnie Sutherland
Managing Partner – Strategic Solutions Limited.I am a strategic planning facilitator ready to guide you through your next strategic planning process.”

Continue Reading

Businessuite News24

Finance Minister Highlights Middle Managers’ Key Role in Jamaica’s Economic Growth

“As Minister, I see every day how important strong leadership is to sustaining the progress we’ve made in stabilising our economy, attracting investment and opening new opportunities for our people,” Mrs. Williams said.

Published

on

Minister of Finance and the Public Service, Hon. Fayval Williams, has underscored the pivotal role middle managers play in driving Jamaica’s economic progress.

“As Minister, I see every day how important strong leadership is to sustaining the progress we’ve made in stabilising our economy, attracting investment and opening new opportunities for our people,” Mrs. Williams said.

She declared that middle managers are “the energy that gets things done” as they move their companies along, exhibiting true leadership that shapes the transformation of teams and influences the drive towards national development.

“[True leadership] is the consistent demonstration of values, authenticity and strategic focus that leaves behind a real legacy… one not written in résumés but in lives changed, organisations built, and futures secured. I know that you know that titles may grant authority, but only influence grounded in service, discipline and integrity builds the trust that moves countries like Jamaica ahead,” Mrs. Williams said.

Minister of Finance and the Public Service, Hon. Fayval Williams (second left), converses with (from left) Director, Montego Bay Chamber of Commerce and Industry, Donovan Chen-See; Managing Director, Make Your Mark Consultants (MYMC), Dr. Jacqueline Coke-Lloyd; and Bishop Dwight Fletcher, during the MYMC two-day Middle Managers’ Leadership Conference at The Jamaica Pegasus hotel on Tuesday (April 29). Mrs. Williams delivered opening remarks.

She was addressing stakeholders on day one of the Make Your Mark Consultants (MYMC) two-day Middle Managers’ Leadership Conference at The Jamaica Pegasus hotel in New Kingston on Tuesday (April 29).

Mrs. Williams noted that strategic and decisive leadership is especially critical in navigating current global uncertainties.

“In today’s increasingly dynamic global trade environment, Jamaica’s agility or ability to move swiftly, decisively and strategically is essential for national success; and at the execution level, it is you, it is our middle managers who drive that success.

You’re the ones ensuring that vision becomes reality, solving problems, coaching teams, delivering results and adapting to change with confidence and clarity,” she contended.

The Minister further pointed out, “In a Jamaica that is growing steadily stronger with sound leadership, prudent economic management, historic low unemployment rates, a transparent inflation-targeting regime, real investments in education, infrastructure, and innovation, it is clear that, as a country, we are on the right path.”

Meanwhile, Mrs. Williams lauded MYMC for organising what she described as the premier management conference in Jamaica, noting that the event is critical as Jamaica navigates an increasingly complex global economy.

She noted that this year’s conference theme – ‘A Legacy of Change, Transformation and Execution’ – is apt for the occasion.

“It reminds us that leadership is not about titles, offices, or positions. It’s about action [and] the courage to move when others hesitate. It’s about vision… the ability to see beyond today’s challenges and into tomorrow’s possibilities. Most importantly, it’s about influence – the ability to inspire people to believe in a cause greater than themselves, to push past limits to build institutions that will stand the test of time,” the Minister emphasised.

Mrs. Williams encouraged the participating middle managers to take advantage of the conference by actively engaging in the discussions, learning from the experts, sharpening their skills and strengthening their networks so they can be better and stronger leaders, driving Jamaica’s continued growth and transformation.

By: Donique Weston, JIS

Continue Reading

Trending

2
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x