Connect with us

Businessuite Markets

Difficult Economic Environment In Trinidad And Tobago Continues To Weigh On Consumer Demand And Pricing Discretion – Mouttet

Published

on

Christian Mouttet Chairman of Trinidad and Tobago based Prestige Holdings Limited, is reporting that for the first half of 2018 Group revenue increased by 3% to TT$521 million, as profit after tax decreased by 16% to TT$13.4 million, from TT$15.8 million in the previous year.

These results, reported in their Consolidated Unaudited Results for the Six Months Ended 31 May 2018 were generated from an average number of 123 restaurants.

Commenting further on the financial performance for the half year, he reported that it was very much in line with the first quarter.

The difficult economic environment in Trinidad and Tobago continued to weigh on consumer demand and pricing discretion. Additionally, he said, food cost inflation remains a challenge, driven by higher currency conversion costs and higher food cost inputs.

Despite the macro-economic environment, he indicated to shareholders that they were confident that with strong brands, there were opportunities for improved performance through better execution, improved operations and continuing to drive demand through relevant and attractive value meal offerings.

While there are some initial signs of improved macro-economic performance in the local economy, he did not expect any significant improvement in consumer sentiment in the second half of 2018.

Prestige Holdings closed the period with earnings per share of 21.5 cents, 16% below that earned for the corresponding period in 2017.BM

Businessuite News24 International

Why Budget Airlines Are Struggling – And Will Pursuing Premium Passengers Solve Their Problems?

As the LCC model struggles, some budget airlines have begun exploring the idea of catering to premium passengers. This shift involves offering a more robust service package, including additional legroom, better in-flight amenities, and flexibility in ticketing—something traditionally associated with full-service airlines. But is this strategy a viable path forward, or will it merely dilute the distinctiveness of the LCC model?

Published

on

Introduction: The Decline of the Low-Cost Carrier (LCC) Model
For decades, the low-cost carrier (LCC) business model has been a game-changer in the aviation industry, enabling millions of travelers to fly on a budget and reshaping the way airlines approach cost structure and pricing.

Airlines such as Southwest, Ryanair, and EasyJet built empires by offering no-frills flights at lower fares, often with ancillary services and fees adding to their bottom lines. However, in recent years, many budget airlines have found themselves struggling as the model faces mounting pressure from rising costs, competition, and changing passenger expectations.

As the aviation industry begins to recover from the COVID-19 pandemic, one question arises: Can budget airlines continue to thrive in a post-pandemic world, or should they shift their focus to a more premium customer base? The idea of upgrading service offerings and pursuing more affluent passengers has gained traction among some players in the LCC space. But is this the right move? Will chasing premium customers solve the problems facing the low-cost model?

The Rise and Evolution of Budget Airlines
The origins of the budget airline model date back to the 1970s, with Southwest Airlines often credited as the first low-cost carrier. Founded in 1967 and taking off in the early 1970s, Southwest revolutionized the industry by offering simple point-to-point routes, standardized aircraft, and minimal frills. This made air travel more affordable for a broader segment of the population and set the stage for the global rise of low-cost carriers in the decades to follow.

Ryanair, founded in 1984, is another key player in the LCC space. Under the leadership of Michael O’Leary, Ryanair aggressively slashed costs by charging for extras, eliminating complimentary services, and focusing on the most profitable routes. These strategies enabled Ryanair to offer low base fares while generating significant revenues from additional fees, such as for checked bags, seat reservations, and food.

By the 1990s and 2000s, the LCC model had spread across Europe and North America, with EasyJet and other carriers joining the ranks. By 2000, LCCs represented around 30% of all European flights, and by 2010, low-cost carriers had captured about 40% of the market share in the United States as time progressed, the model started to face challenges, and a growing number of budget airlines began to struggle. What had been an industry-defining strategy was no longer as effective in a landscape marked by high fuel costs, fluctuating consumer demands, and competition from established full-service airlines that had adopted similar low-cost features.

The Struggles of the LCC Model: Rising Costs and Changing Passenger Expectations

Several factors have contributed to the struggles of budget airlines in recent years.

The first and most significant challenge has been rising operational costs. The aviation industry is heavily dependent on fuel prices, and the volatility of global oil prices has made cost forecasting a challenge for budget carriers. While LCCs historically thrived by keeping their operating costs low, recent increases in fuel prices have affected their profitability, especially as they typically do not hedge against these increases as aggressively as larger full-service airlines.

Another challenge for budget airlines is the increasing complexity of the ancillary revenue model. While extra fees for baggage, seat selection, and food have been critical to budget carriers’ profitability, passengers are growing increasingly frustrated with the “a la carte” pricing. As more passengers find themselves nickel-and-dimed for basic services, their loyalty to LCCs is weakening. Many now perceive budget airlines as offering a subpar experience, particularly when it comes to customer service, flight delays, and lack of amenities.

The post-pandemic has also revealed that travelers are willing to pay more for a better experience, particularly in the business and premium travel segments. With business travel rebounding and higher levels of disposable income in some markets, more affluent passengers are seeking out quality services and comfort. In contrast, the budget airline model—which offers limited amenities and often no flexibility—no longer seems as appealing to those looking for convenience and quality in their travel experience.

Will Pursuing Premium Passengers Solve Budget Airlines’ Problems?

As the LCC model struggles, some budget airlines have begun exploring the idea of catering to premium passengers. This shift involves offering a more robust service package, including additional legroom, better in-flight amenities, and flexibility in ticketing—something traditionally associated with full-service airlines. But is this strategy a viable path forward, or will it merely dilute the distinctiveness of the LCC model?

Case Study: JetBlue Airways

One of the most high-profile examples of a budget airline attempting to capture premium passengers is JetBlue Airways. While JetBlue has long been a low-cost carrier, it has gradually transitioned towards offering more premium services. In 2021, JetBlue introduced its “Mint” premium service on select routes, which includes lie-flat seats, gourmet meals, and access to airport lounges.

The introduction of premium service allowed JetBlue to compete with full-service airlines on select routes, particularly transcontinental and international flights. However, despite the success of the Mint service, JetBlue has been careful not to abandon its core low-cost business model. It continues to offer more affordable fare options while gradually adding premium services as an additional revenue stream.

Case Study: Ryanair’s Transformation

Ryanair, traditionally known for its extreme cost-cutting measures and no-frills service, has also made moves towards appealing to a more premium customer base. In 2021, Ryanair launched a premium offering, Ryanair Plus, which includes benefits such as extra legroom, priority boarding, and flexible ticket options. However, Ryanair has been careful to maintain its low-cost core by keeping its basic fares highly competitive.

This dual approach—where LCC’s maintain their low-cost offerings while introducing premium services for a select group of customers—has been viewed as a potential solution to the struggles facing budget airlines. The question remains whether this hybrid approach will be sustainable, especially if passengers expect the same level of service across all routes and price points.

A Comparison with Full-Service Airlines
The traditional model of full-service airlines is based on offering a wide array of services, from lounge access and in-flight entertainment to flexible ticketing and loyalty programs. These airlines have a higher cost structure but also benefit from customer loyalty and premium pricing. Airlines such as American Airlines, British Airways, and Singapore Airlines continue to cater to the premium passenger, with higher ticket prices offset by high levels of service.

For passengers, the experience of flying on a full-service airline is markedly different from that of a budget carrier. Full-service airlines generally provide better customer service, more comfortable seating, higher quality in-flight entertainment, and perks such as airport lounge access for business-class passengers. However, these services come at a premium price. In contrast, budget carriers offer a more utilitarian flying experience but are considerably cheaper for those willing to forgo the luxuries of air travel.

The key question for the future of the LCC model is whether budget airlines can maintain their identity as low-cost carriers while introducing premium offerings that will satisfy a more discerning customer base without alienating their core market of budget-conscious travelers. As airlines seek to strike a balance between these two approaches, the outcome will ultimately depend on the ability to deliver a more flexible, high-quality experience without significantly raising prices.

The Future of the Budget Airline Model
As budget airlines continue to face rising operational costs and shifting passenger expectations, many are considering shifting their focus to attract more premium passengers. Whether this strategy will succeed or dilute the appeal of the traditional low-cost model remains to be seen. However, the growing demand for enhanced services and the increasing willingness of travelers to pay for comfort presents an opportunity for budget carriers to evolve.

The future of the LCC model may lie in finding the right balance between low-cost operations and premium offerings, catering to both price-sensitive and service-oriented travelers. For the time being, the success of this hybrid model will depend on how effectively airlines can leverage technology, streamline operations, and introduce high-quality experiences while maintaining their competitive edge in pricing.

Continue Reading

Businessuite News24

The Impact of Commercial Bank Rate Policies on Jamaica’s Economic Growth and Investment Landscape

However, a key obstacle to the effectiveness of these policies has been the slow transmission of BOJ rate cuts into the lending rates of commercial banks. The pace at which commercial banks lower their interest rates after the BOJ makes its adjustments has been a source of tension, particularly as high borrowing costs have stifled investment and economic activity in critical sectors such as construction, real estate, the stock market, and broader financial services.

Published

on

Introduction: The Tension Between the Central Bank and Commercial Banks
Jamaica’s economic recovery in recent years has been closely tied to the monetary policies of the Bank of Jamaica (BOJ), which has used interest rate adjustments as a tool to control inflation, stabilize the currency, and foster economic growth.

However, a key obstacle to the effectiveness of these policies has been the slow transmission of BOJ rate cuts into the lending rates of commercial banks. The pace at which commercial banks lower their interest rates after the BOJ makes its adjustments has been a source of tension, particularly as high borrowing costs have stifled investment and economic activity in critical sectors such as construction, real estate, the stock market, and broader financial services.

The Rate Transmission Challenge
For years, the BOJ has maintained an aggressive stance on controlling inflation, setting the policy rate at elevated levels to curb inflationary pressures and stabilize the exchange rate. The central bank’s decision to raise rates has, however, faced resistance when passed through to consumers. While the BOJ adjusts its policy rate, which is expected to affect market rates and borrowing costs, commercial banks in Jamaica have been slower to adjust their own lending rates. The delayed response from commercial banks in reducing interest rates after the BOJ signals a rate cut has created a disconnect in the economy, frustrating the central bank’s efforts to stimulate investment.

“We are absolutely determined that we have to have a much more efficient transmission system,” Bank Of Jamaica Governor Richard Byles

“Commercial banks have been slow to lower lending rates in response to BOJ adjustments, even as the central bank signals its intention to stimulate growth,” says an economist from the Caribbean Development Bank. “This delay results in a less responsive monetary policy, which weakens the transmission mechanism and hampers economic growth.”

This slow pass-through effect has been especially problematic for businesses and consumers relying on credit to drive spending and investment. High lending rates have made borrowing expensive, discouraging business expansion and large-scale investments, especially in sectors like construction and real estate.

“The group’s financial performance continues to reflect the impact of the ongoing high-interest rate environment in Jamaica, which exerts downward pressure on property values, resulting in lower property income relative to prior year.” Norman Reid Chairman FirstRock Real Estate Investments Limited

The Impact on Key Sectors: Real Estate, Construction, and the Stock Market

1. Real Estate and Construction:

The construction and real estate sectors are particularly sensitive to interest rate movements because of their reliance on financing for property development and home purchases. High interest rates have increased the cost of capital for developers, making it more expensive to finance new projects and slowing down the pace of construction. In addition, potential homebuyers have been discouraged by high mortgage rates, further dampening demand in the housing market.

Jamaican developers and real estate professionals have expressed frustration with the lack of affordability. “With borrowing costs so high, it has become increasingly difficult for developers to undertake large projects or offer affordable housing to the average Jamaican,” said a prominent Jamaican real estate developer in an interview with the Jamaica Observer. “This is not just about the cost of money, it’s also about the ripple effect of slower growth in the construction industry, which impacts employment and related sectors.”

“Owing to higher policy interest rates by the Bank of Jamaica, which moved from a historic low of half a per cent (0.50) since October 2021 to the current 6.5 per cent, FirstRock Real Estate Investments Limited has been realising lower property income as pressure continues to weigh down property values resulting in a softening of the market.”

2. The Stock Market:

In the financial markets, particularly the stock market, high interest rates have made government securities more attractive relative to equities. As a result, the Jamaican stock market has seen a period of subdued investor activity. When interest rates are elevated, investors tend to favor the guaranteed returns of bonds and treasury bills, which are perceived as lower risk compared to stocks.

The Jamaican stock market has experienced a sharp decline in activity, with reduced liquidity and a diminished appetite for riskier investments. Analysts suggest that the high cost of capital has discouraged companies from seeking capital through equity financing, opting instead for less-expensive debt or leaving expansion plans on hold. “The slow transmission of lower rates from the BOJ to consumers means that the real economy and the stock market suffer as investment slows,” says an analyst at JMMB Group.

3. The Financial Sector:

The financial sector has been one of the primary sectors impacted by the BOJ’s rate hikes. Banks’ profitability is closely tied to the interest rate spread—the difference between what they pay for funds and what they charge on loans. As commercial banks face high borrowing costs, their interest rate margins tend to widen, increasing profits in the short term. However, in the long term, the suppressed demand for loans due to high rates can limit business growth opportunities and create a drag on the overall financial ecosystem.

“The banking sector is seeing increased profitability on loan spreads, but that comes at the cost of reduced lending, which is unsustainable in the long term,” says a financial analyst with Scotiabank Jamaica. “Banks need to balance profitability with growth, and high interest rates are squeezing that balance.”

The Likely Effects of Falling Interest Rates on Key Sectors

1. A Revival in Real Estate and Construction:

As the BOJ begins to reduce interest rates in response to easing inflationary pressures, the real estate and construction sectors stand to benefit significantly. Lower rates would reduce the cost of financing for both developers and homebuyers, unlocking pent-up demand in the housing market and spurring new construction projects.

Industry stakeholders are optimistic about the potential revival of the construction and real estate sectors. “The drop in interest rates will likely create a favorable environment for developers and potential homeowners. Projects that were previously on hold due to financing costs can now move forward,” says a director at the Jamaica Chamber of Commerce. With a focus on sustainable and affordable housing, developers expect to see increased interest in residential projects as mortgage rates become more manageable.

2. A Boost for the Stock Market:

In the stock market, lower interest rates tend to make equities more attractive compared to fixed-income securities like government bonds. As borrowing costs decrease and disposable income rises, consumer spending increases, driving demand for goods and services. Companies that are able to capitalize on this surge in demand are likely to see stronger earnings, which can attract investors back into the stock market.

In addition, lower rates would reduce the cost of capital for companies looking to expand, potentially leading to increased IPOs and capital raises on the stock exchange. A recovery in investor confidence could stimulate trading volumes and liquidity on the Jamaica Stock Exchange (JSE), enhancing its attractiveness to both local and international investors.

3. A More Dynamic Financial Sector:

The financial sector stands to benefit from a more balanced interest rate environment. Lower rates would stimulate demand for loans and credit products, providing a boost to lending volumes and enabling banks to diversify their portfolios. Banks would also be able to offer more competitive loan products, which would benefit consumers and businesses alike.

In particular, the reduced cost of capital could lead to increased investment in long-term projects, with businesses likely to take on more debt to fund expansion plans. This shift would help create a more dynamic financial sector, capable of sustaining growth in both the short and long term.

Conclusion: A Delicate Balance

The slow pass-through of BOJ rate changes to commercial banks’ lending rates has created challenges for Jamaica’s economic recovery, especially in key sectors like construction, real estate, and the stock market. However, as interest rates begin to fall, the prospects for these sectors are set to improve. Lower rates will encourage investment, promote lending, and make capital more accessible, providing a much-needed stimulus to the Jamaican economy.

As Jamaica navigates the transition to lower interest rates, the effectiveness of the central bank’s policies will depend on how quickly commercial banks respond to rate changes. A more synchronized approach between the BOJ and commercial banks could unlock significant growth potential, driving Jamaica towards a more dynamic and resilient economy.

Continue Reading

Businessuite Markets

138 Student Living Reporting 12 Month Performance Ahead Of Last Year For Both Revenue And Net Profit.

Published

on

Overview
The Group’s performance for the 12 months year-to-date is ahead of last year’s performance for both revenue and net profit. The Group generated net profit of $50.2 million for the quarter and $349.8 million for the twelve-month period. Net profit has consistently grown for the 12 months year-to-date period for the last four years.

Average occupancy for the year was 82% which was an improvement over last year’s 81%. The Group closed the year as at September 30, 2024, with an occupancy of 98%.

For the quarter ended September 30, 2024, the Group’s revenue was $372 million, an increase of 8%, when compared to the $342 million recorded in the prior year’s corresponding period. The movement is derived from increases in rates across all halls and other income. As can be seen from the Twelve Months Revenue Graph above, we continue to experience year on year increase in revenue, this trend is expected to continue.

For the current quarter, other income contributed J$44.7 million and J$155.4 million for the twelve months compared to J$28.4 and J$97.4 million for the corresponding periods, respectively. The increase is primarily driven by better utilization of laundry operations and a one-off sale of surplus equipment during the current quarter.

The Group’s activities resulted in an operating profit of J$136 million for the three months ended September 2024, a decrease of 13% when compared to J$155.5 million in the corresponding prior period. The results were negatively impacted by increases in administrative expenses for general insurance, salaries, and internet services, the latter being required to enable enhanced WI-FI services for our residents.

Profit before taxation was recorded at J$56.0 million for the three-month period ended September 2024 when compared to J$64.5 million for the three-month period ended in September 2023 representing a decrease of 13%.

Earnings per stock unit (EPS) for the three months decreased to $0.09 compared to $0.15 for the three-month period to 30 September 2023. Earnings per stock unit (EPS) for the twelve months decreased to $0.67 compared to $0.83 for the year ended 30 September 2023.

Outlook
Our sustained financial performance is testament to our commitment to operational efficiency, prudent cost management and driving additional revenue. This has allowed us to record consistent year over year increases in revenue and profit. Our outlook is that this trend will continue as the demand for quality student accommodation remains strong.

Ian Parsard Chairman 138 Student Living Jamaica Limited

138 Student Living Jamaica Limited (138SL) Unaudited Financial Statements For The Third Quarter Ended September 30, 2024

For More Information CLICK HERE

Continue Reading

Businessuite Markets

Seprod’s Jamaica Business Banking On Overcoming Sluggishness In Retail Space

Published

on

Highlights From Seprod Limited (SEP) – Unaudited Financial Statements for the 3rd quarter ending September 30, 2024

Q3 performance (July-September 2024)
For the three (3) months ended 30 September 2024 (Q3), the Seprod Group achieved revenues of $35.10 billion, an increase of $7.35 billion (27%) over the corresponding period in 2023.

Gross profit closed at $9.80 billion, an increase of $1.76 billion (39%) above the corresponding period in 2023.

The net profit was $828 million, a decrease of $154 million (16%) versus the corresponding period in 2023 when profits were boosted due to a non-recurring gain of $363 million on net profit and $442 million on other comprehensive income in respect of the restructuring of A.S. Bryden’s post-employment medical plan.

Effective 9 July 2024, A.S. Bryden & Sons Holdings Limited (ASBH) acquired 44.8% of the share capital of Caribbean Producers (Jamaica) Limited (CPJ), a company incorporated and domiciled in Jamaica which is a leading food and beverage distributor for major global brands with a focus on serving hotels and resorts in Jamaica and St.Lucia. CPJ’s results have been consolidated in these financials.

Q3 year-to-date performance (January-September 2024)
For the nine (9) months ended 30 September 2024 (Q3 year-to-date), the Seprod Group achieved revenues of $93.43 billion, an increase of $11.23 billion (14%) over the corresponding period in 2023.

Gross profit closed at $24.72 billion, an increase of $3.86 billion (19%) above the corresponding period in 2023.
The net profit was $2.97 billion, a decrease of $551 million or 16% versus the corresponding period in 2023.
The less than the usual stellar performance was influenced by a definite slowness in the economy post the Beryl hurricane in July plus the USA travel advisory to Jamaica that led to a material reduction in the hotels’ occupancy rates.

Outlook
 The Group anticipates a strong last quarter performance from ASBH as we enter the Christmas season and Carnival band launches.
 ASBH had no profit uplift from CPJ in this quarter, this will turn around in Q4 as the winter tourist season gets going in Jamaica, with the hotels already reporting stronger booking than last quarter experience.
 Seprod’s export is at 20% growth this year and that will close the year even higher.
 Seprod’s Jamaica business is banking on overcoming the sluggishness in the retail space, coupled with reducing cost and improving productivity.

As we look to the last quarter of the year we remain optimistic that we will produce a strong performance that will enable us to partially close the YTD gaps.

Richard R. Pandohie Chief Executive Officer Seprod Limited (SEP)

For More Information CLICK HERE

Continue Reading

Businessuite Markets

EduFocal’s EBITDA Remains Negative, Underscoring The Impact Of Revenue Decline On Profitability.

Published

on

Following the challenges highlighted in Q1 and Q2, EduFocal Limited has continued to navigate a complex operating environment, marked by a decline in revenue and profitability. Management remains committed to the strategic plan laid out in the first half of 2024, with a focus on stabilizing the business, optimizing costs, and repositioning EduFocal for sustainable growth. This quarter, significant progress has been made in implementing our cost-reduction strategies, enhancing our technology platforms, and exploring new revenue avenues.

Progress on Strategic Initiatives

Revenue Diversification and Growth Initiatives
To counter the decline in traditional revenue sources, EduFocal has accelerated efforts to diversify its revenue base. The company has focused on expanding its educational services into new markets and exploring strategic partnerships to enhance its reach. These initiatives aim to build a more resilient revenue model, with an emphasis on recurring revenue streams.

While the impact of these efforts on Q3 results remains limited, early indicators are promising, and management is optimistic that these initiatives will contribute to revenue stabilization in the coming quarters. We are also actively pursuing opportunities to monetize our proprietary technology platforms through licensing agreements, adding a new dimension to our growth strategy.

Operational Efficiency and Cost Optimization
EduFocal’s cost optimization program has yielded measurable results in Q3. A thorough review of our cost structure led to a leaner operational model, with targeted reductions in administrative expenses. The recent workforce restructuring, which was implemented to align our operating expenses with revenue levels, has contributed to this cost-saving initiative. The savings realized from these actions are being reinvested in high-priority areas such as technology and market expansion, ensuring that we remain competitive in our core offerings.

Management continues to assess other areas for potential cost efficiencies. This ongoing review aims to build a more agile and efficient organization, capable of adapting to shifting market conditions while maximizing profitability.

Technology Advancements and Platform Enhancements
EduFocal has completed a significant upgrade to its “Amigo” platform, designed to improve user engagement, retention, and satisfaction. These enhancements are expected to strengthen our competitive position by offering a more robust, interactive, and personalized learning experience. Feedback from early adopters of the upgraded platform has been encouraging, and we are working to expand its features to cater to a broader user base. The technological improvements align with our shift towards a recurring revenue model, where user engagement is critical to maintaining steady income streams. By continually enhancing our platform, we aim to attract new users and retain existing ones, laying the groundwork for long-term growth.

Debt Management and Cash Flow Stabilization
EduFocal’s cash flow constraints, highlighted in the previous quarters, remain a key area of focus.
The company has made progress in managing liquidity through improved working capital practices. We have tightened controls on receivables and are engaging in more proactive cash collection efforts to ensure timely inflows. Additionally, management continued to have discussions to refinance our existing debt under more favorable terms, which should reduce interest expenses and ease cash flow pressures.

In Q3, we also implemented a series of cash conservation measures, deferring non-essential capital expenditures and focusing on core projects with high potential for immediate impact. These steps are critical in stabilizing our cash position as we work towards a more sustainable capital structure.

Q3 Financial Performance Highlights
Revenue
Revenue for Q3 2024 was J$21.79 million, significantly lower than the J$46.86 million in the same quarter of 2023. This decline reflects our ongoing transition to a more predictable and resilient revenue model focused on recurring income. While this shift has temporarily impacted our topline, management believes it is essential for building long-term stability.

Operating Expenses
Operating expenses have been better aligned with our current revenue base as a result of recent restructuring. Administrative expenses were kept under control through cost-saving initiatives, including renegotiated vendor contracts, management of staff costs and streamlined processes. However, these savings have been offset in part by investments in technology, which are essential for future growth.

EBITDA and Net Profit
EduFocal’s EBITDA remains negative, underscoring the impact of the revenue decline on profitability. However, the adjusted EBITDA loss has been mitigated by cost optimization measures, suggesting early signs of improvement in operational efficiency. Net profit remains under pressure, but management expects that revenue diversification and operational improvements will yield a gradual recovery.

Outlook and Forward-Looking Statements

Focus on Revenue Rejuvenation and Growth
EduFocal’s primary goal for the upcoming quarters is to stabilize and grow revenue. The expanded “Amigo” platform, coupled with strategic partnerships and market expansion initiatives, is expected to drive incremental revenue gains. Management is also exploring ways to leverage data analytics to better understand user behavior, which will help refine our offerings and maximize customer lifetime value.

Gordon Swaby
Chief Executive Officer EduFocal Limited (LEARN) 

For More Information CLICK HERE

EduFocal Limited (LEARN) Unaudited Financial Statements for the Third Quarter Ended September 30th, 2024

Continue Reading

Trending

0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x